Conventional radiocarbon dating times online encounters dating agency

by  |  19-Feb-2016 22:21

They have also determined several geophysical causes for past and present fluctuations in carbon-14 production in the atmosphere.4 Specifically, we know that carbon-14 has varied in the past due to a stronger magnetic field on earth and changing cycles in sunspot activity.

So when objects of known historical dates are dated using radiocarbon dating, we find that carbon-14 dates are accurate back to only about 400 BC.

The conventional scientific community ignores at least two factors that are crucial to recalibrating radiocarbon (so that it accounts for major changes in the biosphere and atmosphere that likely resulted from the Flood): (1) The earth’s magnetic field has been progressively stronger going back into the past, and (2) the Flood destroyed and buried a huge amount of carbon from the pre-Flood biosphere.

conventional radiocarbon dating-74conventional radiocarbon dating-84

So a stronger magnetic field in the past would have reduced the influx of cosmic rays.

This in turn would have reduced the amount of radiocarbon produced in the atmosphere.

If this were the case, the biosphere in the past would have had a lower carbon-14 concentration than it does today.

Conventional geologists claim that fossils, coals, and diamonds are millions to billions of years old.

Yet it has now been firmly established that they still contain measurable amounts of radiocarbon, which has a half-life (decay rate) of only 5,730 years.1 This creates a dilemma for conventional geology, as explained in Part 2 of this series.2 Absolutely no radiocarbon should be left in fossils, coals, and diamonds, because after just one million years it should have decayed away.

Community Discussion